Butylated Hydroxytoluene vs Saccharin: which is worse?
Quick answer: Both score equally on our risk model. Butylated Hydroxytoluene is — in the EU and — in the US; Saccharin is — in the EU and — in the US.
| Property | Butylated Hydroxytoluene | Saccharin |
|---|---|---|
| EU status | — | — |
| US status | — | — |
| Risk level | — | — |
| Banned in | Japan (banned for food use) | Canada (banned for food use; permitted in medications only) |
| Restricted in | European Union (ADI-based restrictions), United Kingdom, Australia | European Union (ADI 5 mg/kg body weight; must be labeled), United Kingdom, Australia |
| Category | additive | additive |
| Where it hides | — | — |
What is Butylated Hydroxytoluene?
Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) is a synthetic phenolic antioxidant preservative derived from petroleum. A white crystalline solid with formula C15H24O, it prevents fat oxidation in processed foods, cosmetics, and industrial applications. Often used synergistically with BHA.
What is Saccharin?
Saccharin is the oldest artificial sweetener, discovered accidentally at Johns Hopkins in 1879. It is a sulfonamide compound approximately 300-400 times sweeter than sucrose with no caloric value. It has a slightly bitter metallic aftertaste at higher concentrations. Saccharin's sodium salt (sodium saccharin) is the form used in most food applications.
Documented risks
Butylated Hydroxytoluene: BHT has complex, bidirectional carcinogenicity data — some NTP bioassays found liver tumors in female mice at high doses, while other studies suggested BHT might inhibit cancer initiation. IARC has not formally classified BHT due to conflicting evidence. A 2017 study linked BHT to thyroid hormone disruption in female rats. The American Academy of Pediatrics (2018) recommended reducing synthetic preservative exposure including BHT in children. Kellogg's uses vitamin E in European versions of cereals that contain BHT in US versions — a commercially meaningful substitution.
Saccharin: Saccharin's carcinogenicity history is one of the most tumultuous in food regulatory history. In 1977, the FDA proposed banning saccharin after studies found it caused bladder cancer in rats at very high doses. Congress passed the Saccharin Study and Labeling Act, which put a moratorium on the ban and required a cancer warning label on saccharin products ('Use of this product may be hazardous to your health. This product contains saccharin which has been determined to cause cancer in laboratory animals.'). By 2000, saccharin was removed from the US National Toxicology Program's Report on Carcinogens after subsequent research determined that the bladder cancer in male rats was caused by a rat-specific mechanism — high pH, high protein, and calcium phosphate in rat urine — that does not apply to human urine. The cancer warning label requirement was repealed. IARC also removed saccharin from its Group 2B list in 1999. However, Canada maintained its ban on food use saccharin, citing continued precautionary concern. A 2022 study in Cell found saccharin was among the artificial sweeteners most significantly altering gut microbiome composition and glucose tolerance in previously non-sweetener-using participants. Saccharin showed the largest effect on glucose tolerance among the sweeteners studied (saccharin, sucralose, aspartame, stevia). Saccharin passes through the placenta and appears in breast milk, raising questions about infant exposure that have not been fully resolved.
Scan a barcode and we'll flag both Butylated Hydroxytoluene and Saccharin (plus 200+ other ingredients banned overseas).
Scan free →