Maltodextrin vs Ascorbic Acid: which is worse?

What is Maltodextrin?

Maltodextrin is a polysaccharide derived by partial hydrolysis of starch — most commonly corn starch in the US, but also wheat, potato, or rice starch. It is a white powder with a mild, slightly sweet taste and is highly soluble. Despite being classified as a carbohydrate, maltodextrin has a high glycemic index (GI of 85–105), often higher than table sugar.

What is Ascorbic Acid?

Ascorbic acid is the chemical name for vitamin C, an essential water-soluble vitamin found abundantly in fruits and vegetables. As a food additive (E300), it functions as an antioxidant preservative, preventing oxidative browning and rancidity. Commercial ascorbic acid is produced by fermentation of glucose, most commonly from corn.

Documented risks

Maltodextrin: Maltodextrin's very high glycemic index (GI 85–105) means it causes rapid blood glucose spikes, potentially problematic for people with diabetes or insulin resistance. A 2012 study in PLoS ONE (Bhatt et al.) found that maltodextrin suppressed beneficial gut bacteria (like Lactobacillus) and increased Escherichia coli biofilm formation associated with Crohn's disease. A 2022 study in Nutrients noted maltodextrin's potential to disrupt gut microbiome composition at typical dietary intakes. Regulatory agencies have not restricted its use, but nutrition researchers increasingly flag it as a low-quality carbohydrate.

Ascorbic Acid: Generally recognized as safe. Note: when ascorbic acid is combined with sodium benzoate or benzoic acid in acidic beverages, benzene can form — a Class 1 carcinogen. This combination should be avoided in formulations. As a standalone additive, ascorbic acid is not only safe but nutritionally beneficial. Very high supplemental doses (>2 g/day) can cause diarrhea and kidney stone risk in predisposed individuals.