Maltodextrin vs Calcium Propionate: which is worse?

What is Maltodextrin?

Maltodextrin is a polysaccharide derived by partial hydrolysis of starch — most commonly corn starch in the US, but also wheat, potato, or rice starch. It is a white powder with a mild, slightly sweet taste and is highly soluble. Despite being classified as a carbohydrate, maltodextrin has a high glycemic index (GI of 85–105), often higher than table sugar.

What is Calcium Propionate?

Calcium propionate is the calcium salt of propionic acid, a short-chain fatty acid naturally produced during fermentation. It is one of the most widely used mold inhibitors in commercial bread and baked goods. It works by penetrating fungal cells and lowering internal pH to inhibit growth.

Documented risks

Maltodextrin: Maltodextrin's very high glycemic index (GI 85–105) means it causes rapid blood glucose spikes, potentially problematic for people with diabetes or insulin resistance. A 2012 study in PLoS ONE (Bhatt et al.) found that maltodextrin suppressed beneficial gut bacteria (like Lactobacillus) and increased Escherichia coli biofilm formation associated with Crohn's disease. A 2022 study in Nutrients noted maltodextrin's potential to disrupt gut microbiome composition at typical dietary intakes. Regulatory agencies have not restricted its use, but nutrition researchers increasingly flag it as a low-quality carbohydrate.

Calcium Propionate: Generally recognized as safe. However, a 2012 study in the Journal of Pediatric Child Health (Dengate & Ruben) and a 2019 study published in Science Translational Medicine found that calcium propionate induced insulin resistance in a mouse model and raised metabolic concerns. The 2019 animal study, conducted by Bhatt et al., found that propionate triggered glucagon and norepinephrine secretion. Some open-label human studies and parental reports have linked calcium propionate to irritability, sleep disturbance, and behavioral changes in sensitive children, though these lack robust clinical trial evidence. Most regulatory agencies consider it safe at current use levels.