Modified Food Starch vs Allulose: which is worse?

What is Modified Food Starch?

Modified food starch is starch (derived from corn, wheat, potato, rice, or tapioca) that has been physically, enzymatically, or chemically treated to alter its properties such as thickening ability, heat stability, or freeze-thaw stability. The term 'modified' refers to chemical modification, not genetic modification. Dozens of specific modifications exist, each designated with E numbers E1400–E1450 in the EU.

What is Allulose?

Allulose (D-psicose) is a rare sugar monosaccharide naturally present in trace amounts in wheat, figs, raisins, and jackfruit. It has about 70% of sucrose's sweetness but provides only 0.4 kcal/g (about 10% of sucrose's calories) because it is absorbed but not metabolized. The FDA exempted allulose from the 'total sugars' declaration in 2019.

Documented risks

Modified Food Starch: Modified food starches are generally recognized as safe by the FDA and EFSA. Modified starches from wheat must be declared as allergens in the EU. Phosphorylated starch modifications (E1412, E1414) are permitted at specific maximum levels by EFSA, which noted no safety concerns at authorized levels in its 2017 re-evaluation. Concerns have been raised about the use of modified starch in infant foods — EFSA's Scientific Panel set conservative limits for infants. For healthy adults, dietary exposure via processed foods poses no identified risk.

Allulose: Generally considered safe with a favorable glycemic profile. Human studies show that allulose does not raise blood glucose or insulin. GI effects (bloating, abdominal cramping, diarrhea) have been reported in dose-response studies above 0.4 g/kg body weight; a 2016 study in the journal Food & Chemical Toxicology established a no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) in humans. Compared to erythritol, no cardiovascular concerns have been raised in the literature.