Modified Food Starch vs Erythorbic Acid: which is worse?

What is Modified Food Starch?

Modified food starch is starch (derived from corn, wheat, potato, rice, or tapioca) that has been physically, enzymatically, or chemically treated to alter its properties such as thickening ability, heat stability, or freeze-thaw stability. The term 'modified' refers to chemical modification, not genetic modification. Dozens of specific modifications exist, each designated with E numbers E1400–E1450 in the EU.

What is Erythorbic Acid?

Erythorbic acid is a stereoisomer of ascorbic acid (vitamin C) produced by fermentation of sucrose. While it has similar antioxidant properties to vitamin C, it has very little vitamin C activity (approximately 5%). It is primarily used in meat curing to accelerate the conversion of nitrite to nitric oxide, thereby speeding up the development of the characteristic pink color in cured meats.

Documented risks

Modified Food Starch: Modified food starches are generally recognized as safe by the FDA and EFSA. Modified starches from wheat must be declared as allergens in the EU. Phosphorylated starch modifications (E1412, E1414) are permitted at specific maximum levels by EFSA, which noted no safety concerns at authorized levels in its 2017 re-evaluation. Concerns have been raised about the use of modified starch in infant foods — EFSA's Scientific Panel set conservative limits for infants. For healthy adults, dietary exposure via processed foods poses no identified risk.

Erythorbic Acid: Erythorbic acid is generally recognized as safe. It is not carcinogenic, mutagenic, or teratogenic. At very high doses in animal studies, no toxicity was observed. It is metabolized similarly to ascorbic acid. When used alongside nitrites in cured meats, it serves the beneficial function of reducing nitrosamine formation, potentially making cured meats somewhat safer. No significant adverse effects have been documented at food use levels.