Neotame vs Butylated Hydroxytoluene: which is worse?

What is Neotame?

Neotame is a synthetic dipeptide sweetener — a derivative of aspartame with a 3,3-dimethylbutyl group added to block aspartame's metabolism, preventing the release of phenylalanine. This means it is safe for people with phenylketonuria (PKU), unlike aspartame. It is approximately 7,000-13,000 times sweeter than sucrose.

What is Butylated Hydroxytoluene?

Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) is a synthetic lipophilic phenolic antioxidant preservative derived from petroleum. It is a white crystalline solid with chemical formula C15H24O. Like BHA, it prevents fat oxidation and is widely used in food, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, jet fuel, and rubber.

Documented risks

Neotame: Neotame is one of the newer synthetic sweeteners with a shorter safety track record. A 2023 study published in Frontiers in Nutrition found that neotame damaged intestinal epithelial cells in vitro and disrupted the gut microbiome in mice — including reducing beneficial bacteria and increasing bacterial invasion of intestinal cells. The study observed effects at concentrations that could be achievable through high consumption of neotame-containing products. The FDA has set an ADI of 0.3 mg/kg/day, one of the lower sweetener ADIs, reflecting a conservative safety margin. Limited long-term human safety data exist compared to aspartame, acesulfame K, or saccharin, which have been used for decades. EFSA's 2010 opinion found no safety concern at permitted levels. The Frontiers in Nutrition 2023 gut study represents new concerning findings that warrant further investigation.

Butylated Hydroxytoluene: BHT's carcinogenicity profile is complex and bidirectional. Some NTP bioassays found liver tumors in female mice at high doses, while other studies suggested BHT might inhibit tumor initiation in certain contexts. A 1986 NTP bioassay found liver tumors in female mice but anti-carcinogenic effects in the rat forestomach — making BHT's net carcinogenicity uncertain. IARC has not formally classified BHT in a specific Group due to this conflicting evidence. The NTP notes that BHT's carcinogenicity data are complex. The 'Report on Carcinogens' does not currently list BHT, unlike BHA, but the NTP has noted inconclusive evidence. Potential endocrine disruption: a 2017 study in Environmental Science & Technology found BHT disrupted thyroid hormone levels in female rats. Multiple animal studies have demonstrated weak estrogenic effects. The American Academy of Pediatrics' 2018 policy statement on food additives mentioned BHT as a synthetic preservative warranting reduced childhood exposure. Kellogg's Frosted Flakes in the US contains BHT to preserve freshness; the European version uses mixed tocopherols (vitamin E) instead — a commercially meaningful difference demonstrating feasibility of substitution. Japan banned BHT for food use based on its precautionary approach. The EU restricts it with ADI-based maximum permitted levels.