Propyl Gallate vs Acesulfame Potassium: which is worse?
Quick answer: Propyl Gallate carries the heavier risk profile. Propyl Gallate is — in the EU and — in the US; Acesulfame Potassium is — in the EU and — in the US.
| Property | Propyl Gallate | Acesulfame Potassium |
|---|---|---|
| EU status | — | — |
| US status | — | — |
| Risk level | — | — |
| Banned in | Japan (banned for food use) | — |
| Restricted in | European Union (restricted to 200 mg/kg in specific fat/oil applications), United Kingdom, Australia | European Union (ADI 9 mg/kg body weight; must be labeled E950 or 'sweetener'), Australia, Canada |
| Category | additive | additive |
| Where it hides | — | — |
What is Propyl Gallate?
Propyl gallate is a synthetic antioxidant preservative derived from gallic acid and propanol. It prevents oxidation of fats and oils, extending shelf life of fat-containing foods. It is often used in combination with BHA and BHT for synergistic antioxidant effect. Chemical formula: C10H12O5.
What is Acesulfame Potassium?
Acesulfame potassium (Ace-K) is a calorie-free synthetic sweetener approximately 200 times sweeter than sucrose. It contains a potassium atom bonded to an oxathiazinone dioxide ring structure. It is heat-stable and non-metabolized, passing through the body unchanged. Often blended with sucralose or aspartame to mask bitter aftertaste.
Documented risks
Propyl Gallate: Animal studies have shown propyl gallate may cause liver damage at high doses. Concerns about estrogenic activity have been raised — some studies suggest propyl gallate may weakly mimic estrogen. Contact dermatitis and allergic reactions are documented in both food and cosmetic applications. Japan banned propyl gallate for food use as part of its precautionary approach to synthetic food preservatives. NTP bioassays found dose-dependent liver effects. EFSA's re-evaluation set an ADI of 0.1 mg/kg body weight — one of the lowest ADIs for food additives, reflecting toxicological concern.
Acesulfame Potassium: The safety database for Ace-K is considered less comprehensive than that for other sweeteners. Critics have argued that the original FDA approval studies from the 1970s-1980s were insufficient in quality and length to definitively establish long-term safety. The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) has petitioned for additional testing. Two rat studies found statistically significant increases in lung tumors (in male rats) and mammary tumors at high doses. Regulatory agencies have argued these doses far exceeded typical human exposure and attributed the tumor findings to other factors. However, the question of whether Ace-K's approval studies meet modern standards has been raised by independent researchers. A 2021 study in Cell found that Ace-K and other non-nutritive sweeteners altered gut microbiome composition and affected glucose tolerance in some human participants. Ace-K specifically was associated with changes in gut bacteria that correlated with glycemic effects. Neurological concerns: some animal studies suggest Ace-K may affect brain neurotransmitter systems. A 2013 study in PLoS ONE found that Ace-K consumption in pregnant mice altered offspring postnatal taste preference and increased weight gain, suggesting potential transgenerational effects. These findings were at doses exceeding typical human intake. Endocrine disruption potential has been raised in some in vitro studies, but comprehensive human data are lacking.
Scan a barcode and we'll flag both Propyl Gallate and Acesulfame Potassium (plus 200+ other ingredients banned overseas).
Scan free →