Saccharin vs Dimethylpolysiloxane: which is worse?
Quick answer: Saccharin carries the heavier risk profile. Saccharin is — in the EU and — in the US; Dimethylpolysiloxane is — in the EU and — in the US.
| Property | Saccharin | Dimethylpolysiloxane |
|---|---|---|
| EU status | — | — |
| US status | — | — |
| Risk level | — | — |
| Banned in | Canada (banned for food use; permitted in medications only) | — |
| Restricted in | European Union (ADI 5 mg/kg body weight; must be labeled), United Kingdom, Australia | European Union (E900 permitted; ADI not specified based on current data) |
| Category | additive | additive |
| Where it hides | — | — |
What is Saccharin?
Saccharin is the oldest artificial sweetener, discovered accidentally at Johns Hopkins in 1879. It is a sulfonamide compound approximately 300-400 times sweeter than sucrose with no caloric value. It has a slightly bitter metallic aftertaste at higher concentrations. Saccharin's sodium salt (sodium saccharin) is the form used in most food applications.
What is Dimethylpolysiloxane?
Dimethylpolysiloxane (PDMS, polydimethylsiloxane) is a silicone-based polymer used as an antifoaming agent in food and beverages. It prevents the formation of foam during food manufacturing and cooking. It is the same base material used in silicone cookware, medical devices, and contact lenses.
Documented risks
Saccharin: Saccharin's carcinogenicity history is one of the most tumultuous in food regulatory history. In 1977, the FDA proposed banning saccharin after studies found it caused bladder cancer in rats at very high doses. Congress passed the Saccharin Study and Labeling Act, which put a moratorium on the ban and required a cancer warning label on saccharin products ('Use of this product may be hazardous to your health. This product contains saccharin which has been determined to cause cancer in laboratory animals.'). By 2000, saccharin was removed from the US National Toxicology Program's Report on Carcinogens after subsequent research determined that the bladder cancer in male rats was caused by a rat-specific mechanism — high pH, high protein, and calcium phosphate in rat urine — that does not apply to human urine. The cancer warning label requirement was repealed. IARC also removed saccharin from its Group 2B list in 1999. However, Canada maintained its ban on food use saccharin, citing continued precautionary concern. A 2022 study in Cell found saccharin was among the artificial sweeteners most significantly altering gut microbiome composition and glucose tolerance in previously non-sweetener-using participants. Saccharin showed the largest effect on glucose tolerance among the sweeteners studied (saccharin, sucralose, aspartame, stevia). Saccharin passes through the placenta and appears in breast milk, raising questions about infant exposure that have not been fully resolved.
Dimethylpolysiloxane: Dimethylpolysiloxane is generally considered non-toxic. It is not absorbed by the gut and passes through the digestive system unchanged. The FDA permits it at up to 10 ppm in cooking oils. EFSA's evaluation found no evidence of toxicity at permitted food use levels. There are no established cancer or reproductive toxicity concerns with PDMS at food use concentrations. The compound is the same base polymer used in many safe medical applications including contact lenses and breast implants (though the medical grade is different purity). The main environmental concern is PDMS persistence in the environment, as it is not readily biodegradable. Primary consumer concern is psychological rather than toxicological: the fact that it is used in both McDonald's frying oil and Silly Putty (which also contains PDMS) generates public attention, but the chemistries are actually different grades of the same polymer family.
Scan a barcode and we'll flag both Saccharin and Dimethylpolysiloxane (plus 200+ other ingredients banned overseas).
Scan free →