Sorbitol vs Maltodextrin: which is worse?

What is Sorbitol?

Sorbitol is a sugar alcohol (polyol) naturally found in some fruits, including apples, pears, and prunes. Commercially, it is produced by hydrogenation of glucose. It has approximately 60% of the sweetness of sucrose but provides fewer calories (2.6 kcal/g vs 4 kcal/g for sugar) and does not cause a significant immediate insulin response.

What is Maltodextrin?

Maltodextrin is a polysaccharide derived by partial hydrolysis of starch — most commonly corn starch in the US, but also wheat, potato, or rice starch. It is a white powder with a mild, slightly sweet taste and is highly soluble. Despite being classified as a carbohydrate, maltodextrin has a high glycemic index (GI of 85–105), often higher than table sugar.

Documented risks

Sorbitol: At doses above 20–50 g/day, sorbitol can cause osmotic diarrhea because it is incompletely absorbed in the small intestine and is fermented by colonic bacteria. EU regulations require products containing more than 10% added polyols to carry the label 'excessive consumption may produce laxative effects.' This is well-known and predictable. Sorbitol is not carcinogenic and does not raise blood glucose significantly, making it suitable for diabetics in controlled amounts.

Maltodextrin: Maltodextrin's very high glycemic index (GI 85–105) means it causes rapid blood glucose spikes, potentially problematic for people with diabetes or insulin resistance. A 2012 study in PLoS ONE (Bhatt et al.) found that maltodextrin suppressed beneficial gut bacteria (like Lactobacillus) and increased Escherichia coli biofilm formation associated with Crohn's disease. A 2022 study in Nutrients noted maltodextrin's potential to disrupt gut microbiome composition at typical dietary intakes. Regulatory agencies have not restricted its use, but nutrition researchers increasingly flag it as a low-quality carbohydrate.