Sulfur Dioxide vs Caramel Color IV: which is worse?

What is Sulfur Dioxide?

Sulfur dioxide (SO2) is a colorless gas used as a food preservative and antioxidant. It is the primary active form of the sulfite family of food additives. It is generated by burning sulfur or as a byproduct of certain chemical processes. In food use, it is released from various sulfite salts (E221-E228) and directly applied to some foods.

What is Caramel Color IV?

Caramel Color IV (Class IV caramel, E150d) is a food coloring made by heating sugar with both ammonium and sulfite compounds. This production method creates a unique set of reactive byproducts, notably 4-methylimidazole (4-MEI), which has been linked to cancer in animal studies. It is the most widely used caramel coloring in beverages like Coca-Cola and Pepsi.

Documented risks

Sulfur Dioxide: Same as sodium sulfite: sulfite-sensitive individuals (1% of population, 5% of asthmatics) can experience severe reactions. SO2 in wine has been identified as a contributor to wine-induced headache and asthmatic episodes. Occupational exposure to SO2 gas causes respiratory irritation, bronchospasm, and lung damage at higher concentrations — relevant to workers in winemaking and food processing but not typical dietary exposure levels.

Caramel Color IV: The primary concern with Caramel Color IV is 4-methylimidazole (4-MEI), a byproduct of the ammonia-sulfite caramel production process. The National Toxicology Program (NTP) found that 4-MEI caused lung cancer in male and female mice at high doses in 2-year bioassay studies, leading to California listing 4-MEI as a known carcinogen under Proposition 65 in 2011. The Prop 65 safe harbor level is 29 micrograms 4-MEI per day (the level that would cause 1 additional cancer per 100,000 people over a 70-year lifetime). CSPI testing in 2011-2012 found Coca-Cola and Pepsi sold in California contained 4-MEI levels that, at typical consumption rates, would exceed this threshold — triggering voluntary reformulation by both companies to reduce 4-MEI in their US products. The FDA reviewed 4-MEI and concluded that typical exposure levels 'are not a safety concern.' EFSA's evaluation found the NTP findings concerning but noted the margin of safety at typical European exposure levels. The cancer mechanism in mice involves high doses that may not extrapolate to typical human cola consumption.