Butylated Hydroxyanisole vs Dimethylpolysiloxane: which is worse?
Quick answer: Butylated Hydroxyanisole carries the heavier risk profile. Butylated Hydroxyanisole is — in the EU and — in the US; Dimethylpolysiloxane is — in the EU and — in the US.
| Property | Butylated Hydroxyanisole | Dimethylpolysiloxane |
|---|---|---|
| EU status | — | — |
| US status | — | — |
| Risk level | — | — |
| Banned in | Japan (banned for use in foods containing fats and oils) | — |
| Restricted in | European Union (restricted; banned in baby food), United Kingdom, Australia/New Zealand (ADI-based limits) | European Union (E900 permitted; ADI not specified based on current data) |
| Category | additive | additive |
| Where it hides | — | — |
What is Butylated Hydroxyanisole?
Butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) is a synthetic phenolic antioxidant preservative derived from petroleum. It is a mixture of two isomeric compounds (2-BHA and 3-BHA). BHA prevents fats and oils from oxidizing (going rancid), extending shelf life. Its chemical formula is C11H16O2.
What is Dimethylpolysiloxane?
Dimethylpolysiloxane (PDMS, polydimethylsiloxane) is a silicone-based polymer used as an antifoaming agent in food and beverages. It prevents the formation of foam during food manufacturing and cooking. It is the same base material used in silicone cookware, medical devices, and contact lenses.
Documented risks
Butylated Hydroxyanisole: BHA is classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as Group 2B (possible human carcinogen) based on studies showing it causes papillomas and squamous cell carcinomas of the forestomach in rats, hamsters, and mice at high doses. A 1983 NTP bioassay confirmed these findings. The National Toxicology Program lists BHA as 'reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen' in its Report on Carcinogens. The forestomach is an anatomical structure found in rodents but not humans, creating some uncertainty about direct extrapolation. EFSA's 2012 re-evaluation (EFSA Journal 2012;10(10):2588) concluded that BHA may have endocrine-disrupting potential based on animal data showing interactions with estrogen receptors and androgenic hormone pathways. EFSA found the ADI of 1 mg/kg body weight but noted concerns about endocrine effects. Japan banned BHA for use in foods containing fats and oils, consistent with its generally precautionary approach to synthetic food preservatives. In cosmetics, the EU Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) has assessed BHA and found potential endocrine-disrupting effects at dermal exposure levels. EWG rates BHA as high-concern in Skin Deep cosmetics database. The antioxidant paradox applies: while BHA prevents lipid oxidation in foods, it may paradoxically act as a pro-oxidant in certain biological contexts at certain doses.
Dimethylpolysiloxane: Dimethylpolysiloxane is generally considered non-toxic. It is not absorbed by the gut and passes through the digestive system unchanged. The FDA permits it at up to 10 ppm in cooking oils. EFSA's evaluation found no evidence of toxicity at permitted food use levels. There are no established cancer or reproductive toxicity concerns with PDMS at food use concentrations. The compound is the same base polymer used in many safe medical applications including contact lenses and breast implants (though the medical grade is different purity). The main environmental concern is PDMS persistence in the environment, as it is not readily biodegradable. Primary consumer concern is psychological rather than toxicological: the fact that it is used in both McDonald's frying oil and Silly Putty (which also contains PDMS) generates public attention, but the chemistries are actually different grades of the same polymer family.
Scan a barcode and we'll flag both Butylated Hydroxyanisole and Dimethylpolysiloxane (plus 200+ other ingredients banned overseas).
Scan free →