Brominated Flame Retardants vs Monosodium Glutamate: which is worse?

What is Brominated Flame Retardants?

Brominated flame retardants (BFRs) are a class of synthetic chemicals added to consumer products and materials to reduce flammability. They include polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD), and others. While not direct food additives, they contaminate the food supply through environmental pathways and food packaging.

What is Monosodium Glutamate?

Monosodium glutamate (MSG) is the sodium salt of glutamic acid, a naturally occurring non-essential amino acid found in many proteins. It is used as a flavor enhancer to intensify umami (savory) taste. MSG was first isolated from seaweed in 1908 by Japanese chemist Kikunae Ikeda and has been used commercially since then.

Documented risks

Brominated Flame Retardants: PBDEs and other BFRs are endocrine disruptors, neurodevelopmental toxicants, and probable carcinogens. They accumulate in human adipose tissue, breast milk, and blood. PBDEs were found in 100% of samples in multiple US population biomonitoring studies. US women have PBDE body burdens 10-100 times higher than European women, reflecting the US's historically heavy PBDE use before bans. Neurodevelopmental effects: multiple studies have associated prenatal PBDE exposure with lower IQ, attention deficits, and behavioral problems in children. A 2012 Environmental Health Perspectives study found inverse associations between PBDE cord blood levels and child IQ and behavioral outcomes. Thyroid disruption: BFRs structurally mimic thyroid hormones and compete with thyroid hormone binding proteins, disrupting the thyroid axis — critical for fetal brain development. Carcinogenicity: some PBDEs are associated with thyroid cancer risk in human studies. PBDEs enter the food supply primarily through fatty fish (salmon, tuna), meat, dairy, and some contaminated produce from biosolid-amended soils.

Monosodium Glutamate: MSG safety has been one of the most extensively debated food additive questions in the past 50 years. The 'Chinese Restaurant Syndrome' — a cluster of symptoms (headache, flushing, sweating, chest tightness) reported after eating Chinese food — was attributed to MSG in a 1968 letter in the New England Journal of Medicine. This set off decades of controversy. Multiple rigorous double-blind, placebo-controlled trials have failed to consistently demonstrate that MSG at doses present in food causes these symptoms when participants do not know whether they received MSG or a placebo. A comprehensive 1993 review by the FDA-commissioned Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB) found that while some sensitive individuals may experience symptoms at high doses (>3g of pure MSG on an empty stomach), the doses in typical food servings do not consistently produce symptoms in double-blind conditions. The FDA classifies MSG as GRAS (generally recognized as safe). EFSA's 2017 re-evaluation set an ADI of 30 mg/kg body weight per day, acknowledging that very high doses could affect neurological function but concluding typical dietary exposure is safe. Critics including Dr. Russell Blaylock and advocacy groups have argued that MSG is an 'excitotoxin' — a compound that overstimulates glutamate receptors in the brain and could cause neuronal damage. While glutamate is indeed a neurotransmitter and high-dose glutamate can cause neurotoxicity in animal models, the blood-brain barrier and normal metabolic regulation are generally considered sufficient to prevent dietary MSG from affecting brain glutamate levels. A 2018 EFSA re-evaluation noted that combined exposure to glutamates from all sources (including naturally occurring glutamate in protein-rich foods and other added glutamates E621-E625) could approach the new lower ADI in high consumers — a concern particularly for children with high processed food intake.