Caramel Color IV vs Monosodium Glutamate: which is worse?

What is Caramel Color IV?

Caramel Color IV (Class IV caramel, E150d) is a food coloring made by heating sugar with both ammonium and sulfite compounds. This production method creates a unique set of reactive byproducts, notably 4-methylimidazole (4-MEI), which has been linked to cancer in animal studies. It is the most widely used caramel coloring in beverages like Coca-Cola and Pepsi.

What is Monosodium Glutamate?

Monosodium glutamate (MSG) is the sodium salt of glutamic acid, a naturally occurring non-essential amino acid found in many proteins. It is used as a flavor enhancer to intensify umami (savory) taste. MSG was first isolated from seaweed in 1908 by Japanese chemist Kikunae Ikeda and has been used commercially since then.

Documented risks

Caramel Color IV: The primary concern with Caramel Color IV is 4-methylimidazole (4-MEI), a byproduct of the ammonia-sulfite caramel production process. The National Toxicology Program (NTP) found that 4-MEI caused lung cancer in male and female mice at high doses in 2-year bioassay studies, leading to California listing 4-MEI as a known carcinogen under Proposition 65 in 2011. The Prop 65 safe harbor level is 29 micrograms 4-MEI per day (the level that would cause 1 additional cancer per 100,000 people over a 70-year lifetime). CSPI testing in 2011-2012 found Coca-Cola and Pepsi sold in California contained 4-MEI levels that, at typical consumption rates, would exceed this threshold — triggering voluntary reformulation by both companies to reduce 4-MEI in their US products. The FDA reviewed 4-MEI and concluded that typical exposure levels 'are not a safety concern.' EFSA's evaluation found the NTP findings concerning but noted the margin of safety at typical European exposure levels. The cancer mechanism in mice involves high doses that may not extrapolate to typical human cola consumption.

Monosodium Glutamate: MSG safety has been one of the most extensively debated food additive questions in the past 50 years. The 'Chinese Restaurant Syndrome' — a cluster of symptoms (headache, flushing, sweating, chest tightness) reported after eating Chinese food — was attributed to MSG in a 1968 letter in the New England Journal of Medicine. This set off decades of controversy. Multiple rigorous double-blind, placebo-controlled trials have failed to consistently demonstrate that MSG at doses present in food causes these symptoms when participants do not know whether they received MSG or a placebo. A comprehensive 1993 review by the FDA-commissioned Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB) found that while some sensitive individuals may experience symptoms at high doses (>3g of pure MSG on an empty stomach), the doses in typical food servings do not consistently produce symptoms in double-blind conditions. The FDA classifies MSG as GRAS (generally recognized as safe). EFSA's 2017 re-evaluation set an ADI of 30 mg/kg body weight per day, acknowledging that very high doses could affect neurological function but concluding typical dietary exposure is safe. Critics including Dr. Russell Blaylock and advocacy groups have argued that MSG is an 'excitotoxin' — a compound that overstimulates glutamate receptors in the brain and could cause neuronal damage. While glutamate is indeed a neurotransmitter and high-dose glutamate can cause neurotoxicity in animal models, the blood-brain barrier and normal metabolic regulation are generally considered sufficient to prevent dietary MSG from affecting brain glutamate levels. A 2018 EFSA re-evaluation noted that combined exposure to glutamates from all sources (including naturally occurring glutamate in protein-rich foods and other added glutamates E621-E625) could approach the new lower ADI in high consumers — a concern particularly for children with high processed food intake.