Dimethylpolysiloxane vs Monosodium Glutamate: which is worse?

What is Dimethylpolysiloxane?

Dimethylpolysiloxane (PDMS, polydimethylsiloxane) is a silicone-based polymer used as an antifoaming agent in food and beverages. It prevents the formation of foam during food manufacturing and cooking. It is the same base material used in silicone cookware, medical devices, and contact lenses.

What is Monosodium Glutamate?

Monosodium glutamate (MSG) is the sodium salt of glutamic acid, a naturally occurring non-essential amino acid found in many proteins. It is used as a flavor enhancer to intensify umami (savory) taste. MSG was first isolated from seaweed in 1908 by Japanese chemist Kikunae Ikeda and has been used commercially since then.

Documented risks

Dimethylpolysiloxane: Dimethylpolysiloxane is generally considered non-toxic. It is not absorbed by the gut and passes through the digestive system unchanged. The FDA permits it at up to 10 ppm in cooking oils. EFSA's evaluation found no evidence of toxicity at permitted food use levels. There are no established cancer or reproductive toxicity concerns with PDMS at food use concentrations. The compound is the same base polymer used in many safe medical applications including contact lenses and breast implants (though the medical grade is different purity). The main environmental concern is PDMS persistence in the environment, as it is not readily biodegradable. Primary consumer concern is psychological rather than toxicological: the fact that it is used in both McDonald's frying oil and Silly Putty (which also contains PDMS) generates public attention, but the chemistries are actually different grades of the same polymer family.

Monosodium Glutamate: MSG safety has been one of the most extensively debated food additive questions in the past 50 years. The 'Chinese Restaurant Syndrome' — a cluster of symptoms (headache, flushing, sweating, chest tightness) reported after eating Chinese food — was attributed to MSG in a 1968 letter in the New England Journal of Medicine. This set off decades of controversy. Multiple rigorous double-blind, placebo-controlled trials have failed to consistently demonstrate that MSG at doses present in food causes these symptoms when participants do not know whether they received MSG or a placebo. A comprehensive 1993 review by the FDA-commissioned Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB) found that while some sensitive individuals may experience symptoms at high doses (>3g of pure MSG on an empty stomach), the doses in typical food servings do not consistently produce symptoms in double-blind conditions. The FDA classifies MSG as GRAS (generally recognized as safe). EFSA's 2017 re-evaluation set an ADI of 30 mg/kg body weight per day, acknowledging that very high doses could affect neurological function but concluding typical dietary exposure is safe. Critics including Dr. Russell Blaylock and advocacy groups have argued that MSG is an 'excitotoxin' — a compound that overstimulates glutamate receptors in the brain and could cause neuronal damage. While glutamate is indeed a neurotransmitter and high-dose glutamate can cause neurotoxicity in animal models, the blood-brain barrier and normal metabolic regulation are generally considered sufficient to prevent dietary MSG from affecting brain glutamate levels. A 2018 EFSA re-evaluation noted that combined exposure to glutamates from all sources (including naturally occurring glutamate in protein-rich foods and other added glutamates E621-E625) could approach the new lower ADI in high consumers — a concern particularly for children with high processed food intake.