Neotame vs Red Dye 40: which is worse?

What is Neotame?

Neotame is a synthetic dipeptide sweetener — a derivative of aspartame with a 3,3-dimethylbutyl group added to block aspartame's metabolism, preventing the release of phenylalanine. This means it is safe for people with phenylketonuria (PKU), unlike aspartame. It is approximately 7,000-13,000 times sweeter than sucrose.

What is Red Dye 40?

Red Dye 40 (Allura Red AC) is a synthetic petroleum-derived azo dye that produces a bright red-orange color. It belongs to the monoazo chemical class and is highly water-soluble, with the formula C18H14N2Na2O8S2. It replaced amaranth (Red Dye 2), which was banned in the US in 1976 following cancer concerns.

Documented risks

Neotame: Neotame is one of the newer synthetic sweeteners with a shorter safety track record. A 2023 study published in Frontiers in Nutrition found that neotame damaged intestinal epithelial cells in vitro and disrupted the gut microbiome in mice — including reducing beneficial bacteria and increasing bacterial invasion of intestinal cells. The study observed effects at concentrations that could be achievable through high consumption of neotame-containing products. The FDA has set an ADI of 0.3 mg/kg/day, one of the lower sweetener ADIs, reflecting a conservative safety margin. Limited long-term human safety data exist compared to aspartame, acesulfame K, or saccharin, which have been used for decades. EFSA's 2010 opinion found no safety concern at permitted levels. The Frontiers in Nutrition 2023 gut study represents new concerning findings that warrant further investigation.

Red Dye 40: Red Dye 40 has been linked to several health concerns, particularly in children. The most documented association is with hyperactivity and ADHD-related behavior. A landmark 2007 study in The Lancet (McCann et al.) found that a mixture of six artificial dyes including Red 40, combined with sodium benzoate, significantly increased hyperactivity scores in children ages 3 and 8–9. This prompted EFSA to require the 'may have adverse effect on activity and attention in children' warning label across the EU and UK. A 2012 meta-analysis in Neurotherapeutics (Arnold et al.) confirmed a small but statistically significant deleterious effect of artificial food colors on children's behavior, even in those without diagnosed ADHD. The authors described the effect as a public health issue rather than merely an ADHD issue. Regarding carcinogenicity: commercial batches of Red 40 contain trace amounts of benzidine, an IARC Group 1 human carcinogen. A 1994 study in Food and Chemical Toxicology documented benzidine contamination. The FDA maintains that exposure is below harmful thresholds, but the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) has cited this contamination in multiple ban petitions. Allergic reactions are documented: Red 40 can trigger histamine release leading to hives, rhinitis, and in rare cases anaphylaxis. Cross-reactivity with aspirin is established in aspirin-sensitive individuals. Gut health: A 2021 study in Nature Communications (Kwon et al.) found Red 40 may worsen inflammatory bowel disease and induce colitis-like symptoms in genetically susceptible mice by triggering immune responses in gut-associated lymphoid tissue. In April 2025, HHS Secretary RFK Jr. announced the FDA would phase out Red 40 and 7 other petroleum-based dyes from the US food supply.