Olestra vs Saccharin: which is worse?

What is Olestra?

Olestra (brand name Olean) is a synthetic fat substitute made from sucrose and fatty acids. Unlike regular fats, olestra is not absorbed by the digestive system — it passes through the body unchanged, providing zero calories while mimicking fat's texture and taste in food. It was developed by Procter & Gamble and FDA-approved in 1996.

What is Saccharin?

Saccharin is the oldest artificial sweetener, discovered accidentally at Johns Hopkins in 1879. It is a sulfonamide compound approximately 300-400 times sweeter than sucrose with no caloric value. It has a slightly bitter metallic aftertaste at higher concentrations. Saccharin's sodium salt (sodium saccharin) is the form used in most food applications.

Documented risks

Olestra: Olestra caused significant gastrointestinal side effects that were prominently noted on mandatory warning labels: 'This Product Contains Olestra. Olestra may cause abdominal cramping and loose stools. Olestra inhibits the absorption of some vitamins and other nutrients. Vitamins A, D, E, and K have been added.' Reported gastrointestinal effects included diarrhea, abdominal cramping, oily anal leakage ('anal leakage' or 'rectal leakage'), and fatty stools. These effects were often embarrassing and uncomfortable. Multiple consumer complaints documented GI distress from Olean chips. Beyond GI effects, olestra significantly inhibits the absorption of fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, E, K) and fat-soluble carotenoids (lycopene, lutein, beta-carotene). Since fat-soluble vitamins require fat for absorption, and olestra passes through without being absorbed, it 'captures' these vitamins and carries them out of the body. Studies found olestra consumption reduced serum carotenoid levels, prompting Frito-Lay to fortify olestra products with fat-soluble vitamins to compensate. The FDA removed the mandatory GI warning requirement in 2003 after Frito-Lay argued the warning was overstated, though olestra's use had already declined dramatically due to consumer avoidance.

Saccharin: Saccharin's carcinogenicity history is one of the most tumultuous in food regulatory history. In 1977, the FDA proposed banning saccharin after studies found it caused bladder cancer in rats at very high doses. Congress passed the Saccharin Study and Labeling Act, which put a moratorium on the ban and required a cancer warning label on saccharin products ('Use of this product may be hazardous to your health. This product contains saccharin which has been determined to cause cancer in laboratory animals.'). By 2000, saccharin was removed from the US National Toxicology Program's Report on Carcinogens after subsequent research determined that the bladder cancer in male rats was caused by a rat-specific mechanism — high pH, high protein, and calcium phosphate in rat urine — that does not apply to human urine. The cancer warning label requirement was repealed. IARC also removed saccharin from its Group 2B list in 1999. However, Canada maintained its ban on food use saccharin, citing continued precautionary concern. A 2022 study in Cell found saccharin was among the artificial sweeteners most significantly altering gut microbiome composition and glucose tolerance in previously non-sweetener-using participants. Saccharin showed the largest effect on glucose tolerance among the sweeteners studied (saccharin, sucralose, aspartame, stevia). Saccharin passes through the placenta and appears in breast milk, raising questions about infant exposure that have not been fully resolved.