Perfluorinated Compounds (PFAS) vs Sodium Nitrate: which is worse?
Quick answer: Perfluorinated Compounds (PFAS) carries the heavier risk profile. Perfluorinated Compounds (PFAS) is — in the EU and — in the US; Sodium Nitrate is — in the EU and — in the US.
| Property | Perfluorinated Compounds (PFAS) | Sodium Nitrate |
|---|---|---|
| EU status | — | — |
| US status | — | — |
| Risk level | — | — |
| Banned in | European Union (broadly restricting PFAS in food contact materials since 2020; EU-wide PFAS restriction proposal under REACH), Denmark (banned PFAS in all food packaging 2020) | — |
| Restricted in | United States (EPA has set maximum contaminant levels for 6 PFAS in drinking water in 2024; FDA has been working with industry to phase out certain PFAS from food packaging) | European Union (maximum permitted levels), United Kingdom, Australia |
| Category | additive | additive |
| Where it hides | — | — |
What is Perfluorinated Compounds (PFAS)?
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a large family of synthetic chemicals characterized by extremely strong carbon-fluorine bonds. They are used in food packaging (grease-resistant coatings), non-stick cookware (PTFE/Teflon), food processing equipment, firefighting foam, and many industrial applications. The 'forever chemicals' moniker reflects their extreme environmental persistence.
What is Sodium Nitrate?
Sodium nitrate (NaNO3) is a naturally occurring salt found in soil and some plants, and also synthetically produced for use as a food preservative and curing agent. It is converted to sodium nitrite by bacterial action in foods or in the body, where it exerts its preservative and curing effects. Sometimes called 'Chile saltpeter' after its natural South American ore source.
Documented risks
Perfluorinated Compounds (PFAS): PFAS are among the most extensively studied and harmful groups of synthetic chemicals in the modern environment. Their unique carbon-fluorine bond stability means they do not break down in the environment or in human body tissues — contributing to bioaccumulation over a lifetime. Health effects documented in human epidemiological studies include: - Cancer: PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid) and PFOS (perfluorooctanesulfonic acid) have been associated with kidney cancer, testicular cancer, thyroid cancer, bladder cancer, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma in occupationally exposed workers and community members with contaminated drinking water. IARC classified PFOA as Group 1 (human carcinogen) in 2023 and PFOS as Group 2B. - Endocrine disruption: PFAS disrupt thyroid hormone signaling and sex hormone balance. Multiple studies find associations between PFAS exposure and hypothyroidism, early puberty in girls, and reduced sperm quality. - Immune suppression: studies have found that PFAS exposure is associated with reduced vaccine response in children and adults, suggesting PFAS may impair immune function. - Developmental effects: prenatal PFAS exposure has been associated with lower birth weight, developmental delays, and reduced immune response in infants. - Cholesterol: PFAS exposure consistently raises LDL cholesterol levels, increasing cardiovascular disease risk. The 2023 EPA MCLG (maximum contaminant level goal) for PFOA and PFOS is zero — reflecting the agency's conclusion that there is no safe level. The EPA set enforceable MCLs in drinking water in 2024. The DuPont/3M PFOA/PFOS contamination of drinking water in communities near Teflon manufacturing facilities led to a $671 million settlement (DuPont/Chemours, 2017) and $10.3 billion 3M settlement (2023) — among the largest environmental contamination settlements in history.
Sodium Nitrate: Sodium nitrate shares the same health concerns as sodium nitrite: conversion to nitrosamines is the primary mechanism of concern. Sodium nitrate is converted to nitrite by bacterial reduction in foods and by nitrate-reducing bacteria in saliva before reaching the stomach. The subsequent conversion of nitrite to nitrosamines carries the same carcinogenicity concerns described for sodium nitrite. IARC's 2015 classification of processed meat as Group 1 human carcinogen applies to all nitrite/nitrate-cured processed meats. EFSA's 2017 re-evaluation established acceptable daily intakes (ADIs) for nitrate (3.7 mg/kg body weight/day) and nitrite (0.07 mg/kg body weight/day) based on risk assessment. A notable paradox in nitrate nutrition: dietary nitrate from vegetables (particularly leafy greens like spinach, arugula, and lettuce, and root vegetables like beets) is associated with cardioprotective effects through the nitrate-nitrite-NO pathway, where nitric oxide from dietary nitrate improves vascular function and reduces blood pressure. This beneficial effect of vegetable nitrate contrasts with the potential harm from processed meat nitrate/nitrite, suggesting that the food matrix and associated compounds (antioxidants in vegetables vs. amines in meat protein) significantly influence whether nitrite produces beneficial or harmful effects. Infant exposure to high nitrate levels — particularly from well water — can cause methemoglobinemia ('blue baby syndrome'). The EU and WHO set strict nitrate limits for infant water and food for this reason.
Scan a barcode and we'll flag both Perfluorinated Compounds (PFAS) and Sodium Nitrate (plus 200+ other ingredients banned overseas).
Scan free →