Red Dye 3 vs Saccharin: which is worse?

What is Red Dye 3?

Red Dye 3 (erythrosine) is a synthetic cherry-pink fluorescent dye belonging to the xanthene class. It contains approximately 58% iodine by weight, distinguishing it from azo dyes. Its chemical formula is C20H6I4Na2O5. Approved since 1907, it is one of the oldest certified US food colorants and was notably the first synthetic food dye formally revoked by the FDA in decades.

What is Saccharin?

Saccharin is the oldest artificial sweetener, discovered accidentally at Johns Hopkins in 1879. It is a sulfonamide compound approximately 300-400 times sweeter than sucrose with no caloric value. It has a slightly bitter metallic aftertaste at higher concentrations. Saccharin's sodium salt (sodium saccharin) is the form used in most food applications.

Documented risks

Red Dye 3: The FDA revoked Red Dye 3 authorization in January 2025, marking the first synthetic food dye ban by the FDA since Red Dye 2 in 1976. The revocation was triggered by the Delaney Clause, which mandates revocation of any food additive found to cause cancer in animals regardless of dose. The carcinogenicity data stems from studies showing that high doses of erythrosine caused thyroid follicular cell tumors in male rats. The mechanism is indirect: erythrosine suppresses thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) feedback by elevating thyroxine (T4) levels, causing chronic TSH suppression that promotes thyroid cell proliferation and ultimately tumor formation. This is a rat-specific mechanism related to their thyroxine-binding protein system, which differs from human biology. EFSA's 2011 comprehensive safety assessment concluded erythrosine was unlikely to be genotoxic at typical food use levels and set an ADI of 0.1 mg/kg body weight — one of the lowest for any food color. EFSA restricted EU use to cocktail cherries only (max 200 mg/kg). The high iodine content (58% by weight) raises concerns for thyroid-sensitive individuals. Excessive erythrosine intake could theoretically contribute to iodine overload and thyroid disruption, particularly in individuals with hyperthyroidism or Hashimoto's disease. The FDA had been aware of the rat thyroid tumor data since 1990 but delayed action for 35 years. Advocacy groups including CSPI petitioned for a ban since 1983. The January 2025 revocation finally addressed this long-standing regulatory gap.

Saccharin: Saccharin's carcinogenicity history is one of the most tumultuous in food regulatory history. In 1977, the FDA proposed banning saccharin after studies found it caused bladder cancer in rats at very high doses. Congress passed the Saccharin Study and Labeling Act, which put a moratorium on the ban and required a cancer warning label on saccharin products ('Use of this product may be hazardous to your health. This product contains saccharin which has been determined to cause cancer in laboratory animals.'). By 2000, saccharin was removed from the US National Toxicology Program's Report on Carcinogens after subsequent research determined that the bladder cancer in male rats was caused by a rat-specific mechanism — high pH, high protein, and calcium phosphate in rat urine — that does not apply to human urine. The cancer warning label requirement was repealed. IARC also removed saccharin from its Group 2B list in 1999. However, Canada maintained its ban on food use saccharin, citing continued precautionary concern. A 2022 study in Cell found saccharin was among the artificial sweeteners most significantly altering gut microbiome composition and glucose tolerance in previously non-sweetener-using participants. Saccharin showed the largest effect on glucose tolerance among the sweeteners studied (saccharin, sucralose, aspartame, stevia). Saccharin passes through the placenta and appears in breast milk, raising questions about infant exposure that have not been fully resolved.