Sodium Nitrate vs Sucralose: which is worse?
Quick answer: Both score equally on our risk model. Sodium Nitrate is — in the EU and — in the US; Sucralose is — in the EU and — in the US.
| Property | Sodium Nitrate | Sucralose |
|---|---|---|
| EU status | — | — |
| US status | — | — |
| Risk level | — | — |
| Banned in | — | — |
| Restricted in | European Union (maximum permitted levels), United Kingdom, Australia | European Union (ADI 15 mg/kg body weight; required labeling), Australia, Canada |
| Category | additive | additive |
| Where it hides | — | — |
What is Sodium Nitrate?
Sodium nitrate (NaNO3) is a naturally occurring salt found in soil and some plants, and also synthetically produced for use as a food preservative and curing agent. It is converted to sodium nitrite by bacterial action in foods or in the body, where it exerts its preservative and curing effects. Sometimes called 'Chile saltpeter' after its natural South American ore source.
What is Sucralose?
Sucralose is a synthetic non-caloric sweetener made by selectively chlorinating three hydroxyl groups in sucrose (table sugar). Despite being derived from sugar, the chlorination makes it non-digestible: most passes through the body without being metabolized. It is approximately 600 times sweeter than sucrose.
Documented risks
Sodium Nitrate: Sodium nitrate shares the same health concerns as sodium nitrite: conversion to nitrosamines is the primary mechanism of concern. Sodium nitrate is converted to nitrite by bacterial reduction in foods and by nitrate-reducing bacteria in saliva before reaching the stomach. The subsequent conversion of nitrite to nitrosamines carries the same carcinogenicity concerns described for sodium nitrite. IARC's 2015 classification of processed meat as Group 1 human carcinogen applies to all nitrite/nitrate-cured processed meats. EFSA's 2017 re-evaluation established acceptable daily intakes (ADIs) for nitrate (3.7 mg/kg body weight/day) and nitrite (0.07 mg/kg body weight/day) based on risk assessment. A notable paradox in nitrate nutrition: dietary nitrate from vegetables (particularly leafy greens like spinach, arugula, and lettuce, and root vegetables like beets) is associated with cardioprotective effects through the nitrate-nitrite-NO pathway, where nitric oxide from dietary nitrate improves vascular function and reduces blood pressure. This beneficial effect of vegetable nitrate contrasts with the potential harm from processed meat nitrate/nitrite, suggesting that the food matrix and associated compounds (antioxidants in vegetables vs. amines in meat protein) significantly influence whether nitrite produces beneficial or harmful effects. Infant exposure to high nitrate levels — particularly from well water — can cause methemoglobinemia ('blue baby syndrome'). The EU and WHO set strict nitrate limits for infant water and food for this reason.
Sucralose: A 2023 study published in Nature Medicine found that sucralose-1,6-hexanediacid — a gut-derived metabolite of sucralose — enhanced T-cell immune activity in vitro. The researchers found that sucralose exposure in certain doses could potentially affect immune function. However, this was an early-stage study and its clinical implications for humans are not established. A 2021 Cell study found that sucralose and other non-nutritive sweeteners altered gut microbiome composition and glucose tolerance in human participants who were non-habitual sweetener users. The study found sucralose consumption was associated with glucose intolerance changes in some individuals, suggesting gut microbiome-mediated effects on metabolism. A 2016 study in the International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health found sucralose consumption was associated with higher leukemia incidence in male mice at high lifetime doses. This finding prompted significant concern, though regulators noted the doses used far exceeded typical human intake. Chlorinated compounds: sucralose contains chlorine atoms in its structure. Critics have argued this makes it similar to organochlorine compounds, some of which are known carcinogens. Regulatory agencies have reviewed this and do not consider the chlorine in sucralose equivalent to organochlorine pollutants; the chlorinated positions are not metabolically active. However, high-temperature cooking with sucralose can generate chlorinated compounds. EFSA's 2017 re-evaluation concluded sucralose is safe and non-carcinogenic at its ADI of 15 mg/kg body weight. The FDA ADI of 5 mg/kg/day provides a substantial safety margin relative to typical consumer intake from Splenda use.
Scan a barcode and we'll flag both Sodium Nitrate and Sucralose (plus 200+ other ingredients banned overseas).
Scan free →